ROSA Desktop Fresh R10 LxQT (RC) on QA, ISOs here...

News about ROSA
Post Reply
User avatar
NicCo
Amministratore
Amministratore
Posts: 4739
Joined: 6 December 2007, 19:54

ROSA Desktop Fresh R10 LxQT (RC) on QA, ISOs here...

Post by NicCo »

ROSA has started to release R10 LxQT ISOs for the QA,
these are to be currently considered as in final RC status,
LxQT might be the next R10 edition to be released asap...

Here are all the ISO images:
https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... oducts/186

64bit > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20631
32bit > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20630
11:15 am > From: Andrey Bondrov

The latest two products are already on QA
If they pass QA, I'll build also two special ISOs (32 UEFI, 64 non-UEFI)
if you download and try these ISOs, please share here your experience and impressions:
remind that, all your important and useful messages will be forwarded to ROSA, THX!
.
--- Professional experience ---
Kernel designer, engineer, maintainer and tester for ROSA Desktop and OpenMandriva Lx O.S.

--- currently I'm playing with ---
LTS Kernels > Linux 4.1.12-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.18.17-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.14.46-nrjQL
EOL Kernels > Linux 3.19.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.17.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.15.10-nrjQL

User avatar
NicCo
Amministratore
Amministratore
Posts: 4739
Joined: 6 December 2007, 19:54

Re: ROSA Desktop Fresh LxQT (RC) on QA, ISOs here...

Post by NicCo »

Sent on:1:05 pm

NicCo
About the > LxQT i ISOs: have you completed the QA? are OK for you?

From:keleg77
> Владимир Потаповno, No, I found one issue with open LO files from SMB shares
You can follow the LxQT status, here:
http://bugs.rosalinux.ru/show_bug.cgi?id=8556

SMB shares (with LibreOffice files) fixed in these current ISOs:
32 non-UEFI: https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20656
64 UEFI: https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20663

these now are being QA, if everything is OK, these will become the official ISOs for LxQT
.
--- Professional experience ---
Kernel designer, engineer, maintainer and tester for ROSA Desktop and OpenMandriva Lx O.S.

--- currently I'm playing with ---
LTS Kernels > Linux 4.1.12-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.18.17-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.14.46-nrjQL
EOL Kernels > Linux 3.19.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.17.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.15.10-nrjQL

User avatar
NicCo
Amministratore
Amministratore
Posts: 4739
Joined: 6 December 2007, 19:54

Re: ROSA Desktop Fresh LxQT (RC) on QA, ISOs here...

Post by NicCo »

ISOs with the latest fixes, that have surpassed QA
Vladimir Potapov 2017-12-18 13:13:46 MSK

> 32 non-UEFI:
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20656

> 64 UEFI:
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20663
********************************
QA Verified
Comment 23 Andrey Bondrov 2017-12-18 18:15:27 MSK

Special builds:

32 UEFI: https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20703

64 non-UEFI: https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ists/20704
.
--- Professional experience ---
Kernel designer, engineer, maintainer and tester for ROSA Desktop and OpenMandriva Lx O.S.

--- currently I'm playing with ---
LTS Kernels > Linux 4.1.12-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.18.17-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.14.46-nrjQL
EOL Kernels > Linux 3.19.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.17.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.15.10-nrjQL

User avatar
NicCo
Amministratore
Amministratore
Posts: 4739
Joined: 6 December 2007, 19:54

Re: ROSA Desktop Fresh LxQT (RC) on QA, ISOs here...

Post by NicCo »

Vladimir Potapov 2017-12-20 17:27:42 MSK

(In reply to comment #23)
> Special builds:
>
> 32 UEFI:
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ducts/186/
> product_build_lists/20703
>
> 64 non-UEFI:
> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/rosa ... ducts/186/
> product_build_lists/20704

****************************
**
QA Verified
.
--- Professional experience ---
Kernel designer, engineer, maintainer and tester for ROSA Desktop and OpenMandriva Lx O.S.

--- currently I'm playing with ---
LTS Kernels > Linux 4.1.12-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.18.17-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.14.46-nrjQL
EOL Kernels > Linux 3.19.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.17.8-nrjQL <<< Linux 3.15.10-nrjQL

Post Reply